EQUALITY AND THE TREATMENT‐ENHANCEMENT DISTINCTION

In From Chance to Choice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler propose a new way of defending the moral significance of the distinction between genetic treatments and enhancements. They develop what they call a ‘normal function model’ of equality of opportunity and argue that it offers a ‘limited’ defence of this distinction. In this article, I critically assess their model and the support it (allegedly) provides for the treatment‐enhancement distinction. First, I argue that there is a troubling tension in the normal function model. Secondly, I argue that neither of the rationales invoked by Buchanan et al. really serves to justify this model or the results they seek to derive from it with respect to the significance of the distinction between treatments and enhancements.     

Bathymetric barriers promoting genetic structure in the deepwater demersal fish tusk (Brosme brosme)

Population structuring in the North Atlantic deepwater demersal fish tusk ( Brosme brosme ) was studied with microsatellite DNA analyses. Screening eight samples from across the range of the species for seven loci revealed low but significant genetic heterogeneity ( F _ST = 0.0014). Spatial genetic variability was only weakly related to geographical (Euclidean) distance between study sites or separation of study sites along the path of major ocean currents. Instead, we found a significant effect of habitat, indicated by significant differentiation between relatively closely spaced sites: Rockall, which is surrounded by very deep water (>1000 m), and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, which is separated from the European slope by a deep ocean basin, were differentiated from relatively homogeneous sites across the Nordic Seas. Limited adult migration across bathymetric barriers in combination with limited intersite exchange of pelagic eggs and larvae due to site-specific circulatory retention or poor survival during drift phases across deep basins may be reducing gene flow. We regard these limitations to gene flow as the most likely mechanisms for the observed population structure in this demersal species. The results underscore the importance of habitat boundaries in marine species.     

Neuromelanin and its Possible Protective and Destructive Properties

The function of neuromelanin is not known, but some properties of the pigment suggest a protective action. Its unique ability to accumulate and retain several compounds, such as various amines and a number of metals, may protect the pigment-containing neurons from high exposure to harmful substances. This possible mechanism of protection may however in certain instances be of a double-edged nature, as accumulation of neurotoxic agents with a high melanin affinity may cause toxic concentrations in the neuro-melanin-containing cells. MPTP (l-methyl-4-phenyl-l,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) seems to be such a compound, as it has been found to preferentially destroy neuromelanin-containing cells. The degree of MPTP neurotoxicity seems to be related to the amount of neuromelanin present in the particular species. It is possible that also manganese, which is known to cause an extrapyramidal disorder resembling Parkinson's disease, causes injury to neuromelanin-bearing neurons due to its melanin affinity. This mechanism may be involved in other forms of chemically induced Parkin-sonism and possibly also in idiopathic Parkinson's disease, although the offending agent remains to be discovered.